<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>The Tech - MIT's Student Newspaper</title>
<link>http://www-tech.mit.edu</link>
<description>Headlines from The Tech, MIT's Student Newspaper</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright The Tech 1881-2008</copyright>

<item><title>Corrections</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/corrections.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/corrections.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Because of an editing error, the article “Head of Mechanical Engineering Dept. Will Leave His Post in July” (Friday, May 9) implied that outgoing department chair Rohan Abeyaratne said he wanted to hire more energy researchers working on “micro and nanotechnology.” While he said the lab should continue to increase its energy research, he has actually already hired “micro and nanotechnology” faculty experts during his tenure as department chair; he did not say that the department should hire more.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Letters to the Editor</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/letters.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/letters.html</guid><description><![CDATA[As one of the steering committee members of the Israel@60 week at MIT, I was perplexed and bothered by the placement of a blatantly anti-Israel ad in the Tuesday, May 13 edition of <i>The Tech</i>. The events we coordinated were designed to celebrate Israeli culture and the contributions of Israeli society with a general good will toward sections of the student demographic that may share divergent attitudes toward Israel. The week was explicitly non-political, non-propagandistic, and strictly NOT anti-Palestinian/Arab.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Reinventing Student Input</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/holmes.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/holmes.html</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="byline">By Martin F. Holmes</div>MIT needs to reinvent the way it solicits and uses student input.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>The Graduate Student Council: A Year Ahead</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/nir.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N27/nir.html</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="byline">By Oaz Nir</div>It is well-known that MIT is unique in its path-shaping commitment to the pursuit of knowledge and in the translation of cutting-edge research into the practical realm. Less well-known is that MIT is unique, compared to other major universities, in having graduate students make up a significant majority of our 10,000-strong student body.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Letters to the Editor</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N26/letters.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N26/letters.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Given the endless attention in the past few issues to China’s human rights abuses as the summer Olympics in Beijing approach, I thought this photograph (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3128202.stm) found in a German archive could spark further discussion about possible parallels between China today and Nazi Germany. ]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Stop Spying on Freshmen</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N26/clearinghouse.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N26/clearinghouse.html</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="byline">By Ana-Maria Piso  and Tom Kennedy</div>The Inter-Fraternity Council recruitment rules this year include mandatory use of the Clearinghouse system. ]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>An Open Letter to the Incoming UAP/VP</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N26/awyne.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N26/awyne.html</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="byline">By Martin F. Holmes and Ali S. Wyne</div>Dear Noah and Mike:]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Letters to the Editor</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N25/letters.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N25/letters.html</guid><description><![CDATA[In the last issue of the Tech, Miguel Valença Pires G has labeled the response of the MIT Chinese student community to recent cartoons as “a type of attack,” raising a question “what chance do more basic human rights stand?” However, the author misunderstands the response of Chinese students and I do not agree that it is a type of attack. Moreover, I doubt that the author even knows what <i>basic</i> human rights means, especially to people living in China.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Foreign Policy Principles for the Next Administration </title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N25/awyne.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N25/awyne.html</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="byline">By Ali Wyne</div>Restoring America’s standing in the world must surely rank as the next administration’s foremost priority. Unfortunately, the three remaining presidential candidates have yet to articulate a clear strategy for achieving this (admittedly daunting) objective. Whoever prevails in November should ground their strategy in seven principles and policies. I do not regard the first three as particularly controversial — the experiences of the past decade or so yield them quite naturally — and, as such, I present them without comment:]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Letters to the Editor</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N24/letters.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N24/letters.html</guid><description><![CDATA[In the May 2 issue of <i>The Tech</i>, Miguel Valença Pires describes the reaction of some Chinese students to the cartoons critical of their country as a personal “attack,” and advises “brushing aside the criticism” or “taking it at face value.”]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Letters to the Editor</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N23/letters.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N23/letters.html</guid><description><![CDATA[I have never really been too energized about the cause of Tibet (worthy, no doubt, but just not one of my “pet” causes) and was somewhat ambivalent on the whole issue of the Olympics in China. On one hand, it would be nice to have the Olympics hosted in a place that was more representative of the values the Games are so frequently said to stand for, on the other hand it would be a bit hypocritical of me not to allow my televised sports entertainment to come from a place that already produces pretty much everything else I consume. Even the fact that China is taking this chance as an opportunity to show off its new-found wealth didn’t bother me — hosting and competing in Olympic Games has always been about nationalism, determining who has the best genes, the best doctors, the best coaches, and sometimes even the best athletes. However, the seemingly organized uproar that has been created by an apparently significant portion of the Chinese population at MIT and elsewhere to the vocal criticisms of a few semi-organized activists has managed to change my mind.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Corrections</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N23/corrections.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N23/corrections.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Because of a typographical error, the April 15 editorial “COD Should Face Tough Questions” misstated the middle initial of the Committee on Discipline’s former chair. He is George E. Apostolakis, not George J. Apostolakis.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Letters to the Editor</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N22/letters.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N22/letters.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Whose idea was it to give far more page space to Baker House’s Piano Drop than the UA presidential elections? Last time I checked, two broken pianos don’t have a say in whether I have to eat in a dining hall or if incoming freshmen get their choice of living groups. The UA may not be the most well-liked group on campus, but without a doubt it is one of the most influential and their elections (which determine who represents me and the entire undergraduate community to the administration) deserve a bit more attention. At least we know that if Baker House decides to drop the UA Exec Board off a roof, everyone will hear about it.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Multiculturalism May Erode Strength Of Western Values</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N22/multiculturalism.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N22/multiculturalism.html</guid><description><![CDATA[<div class="byline">By Justin Wong</div>Amal Dorai G mischaracterizes my letter from last week. Far from saying that we should accommodate the intolerance of other cultures, I was posing a question — how do we reconcile our liberal society (here I use “liberal” in its classical sense) with respect for multicultural diversity, when some of our own values, such as respect for the rights of homosexuals, conflict with those of other cultures? Do we dare to assert the superiority of civilized Western liberalism over the medieval puritanism which still persists in some parts of the world today? Dorai seems to think so, and his letter suggests that it is ridiculous to think otherwise — he believes it is “ludicrous” to accommodate another culture’s bigotry.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<item><title>Letters to the Editor</title><link>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N21/letters.html</link><guid>http://www-tech.mit.edu/V128/N21/letters.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Thomas Armet suggests that The Tech should have not published Artem Kras’ name to avoid a “witch hunt.” The term “witch hunt” distinctly implies an absence of “witches,” which is not the case here — there was a severe incident with an identifiable perpetrator, and the Committee on Disciple proved too impotent to effectively punish him. <i>The Tech</i> is acting as an important public servant by ensuring that Kras is roundly ridiculed for his actions, and is doing the COD’s job by ensuring that this kind of action does not go unpunished in our community.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><category>Opinion</category></item>
<atom:link href="http://www-tech.mit.edu/rss/opinion.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- July 6, 2008, 9:41:29 AM //-->
